House of Saud used by the Rothschilds to divide Muslims and secure the state of Israel

Prince Abdullah Bin Fahad Al-Saud----there's certainly something obscure about the origins and ethnicity of Saudi royalty

As outlined in articles by Peter Goodgame, The Globalists and the Islamists, the Jewish elite have had a hand in forming and financing all of the so-called “terrorist organizations” of the twentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Hamas of Palestine, and the Afghan Mujahideen. But according to the following article by David Livingstone, the leading Jews’ duplicity of that sort dates back further, to the eighteenth century, when judaized British Freemasons conspired to create the Wahhabi sect in Saudi Arabia, to divide Islam, and provide a geopolitical advantage for a new state of Israel, and by that further foster the elite Jews’ global takeover agenda.

Ibn Saud and William A. Eddy

“That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a Turkish work, Mir’at al-Haramain, by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century.

The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known document by the name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel, and later in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English and other languages.

The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for his government, which sent him to the Middle East to discover ways to undermine the Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to promote were racism and nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication and tempting Muslim women to uncover themselves.

King Abdul Aziz on board the USS Quincy

But most important was the strategy to “insert heresies into Muslims’ creedal tenets and then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror.” To this purpose, Hempher located a particularly corrupt individual by the name of Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab.

To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it is first necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims, regardless of their race or nationality, to see themselves as brothers in faith. The killing of another Muslim was strictly forbidden.

However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the British hoped to pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish brothers. The only way to do so was to find a loophole in Islamic law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as apostates.

Ibn Saud and Faisal of Iraq with Zionists on board the Lauren in 1949

Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to insinuate this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula. Basically, Wahhab contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act of offering prayers to saints, their Turkish brethren had forfeited their faith, and therefore, that it was permitted to kill all who refused to adhere to his reforms, and to enslave their women and children. But that included the entire Muslim world, except for his small misguided band of followers.

But the Wahhabi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of the Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from Jewish merchants from Iraq. Orthodox jurists of the time branded the Wahhabis as heretics and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance. Nevertheless, the Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for their pretended faith by indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then set about destroying all the holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the Prophet’s treasure, which included holy books, works of art and innumerable priceless gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had destroyed were used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals.

The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in 1818, but the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal I. The movement was then somewhat restored until once again destroyed at the end of the nineteenth century.

To the left abd al-aziz ibn-saud seated with other male members of his family in 1911

After WWI, the former regions of the Ottoman Empire were divided into varying puppets’ regimes. For aiding to undermine the Ottoman authority in the region, Ibn Saud was duly rewarded with the creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932. One year later, in 1933, the Saudis granted oil concessions to California Arabian Standard Oil Company (Casoc), affiliate of Standard Oil of California (Socal, today’s Chevron), headed by Rothschild agent, and chief among [US so-called] Illuminati families, John D. Rockefeller. Since that time, Saudi Arabia has been the most important ally to the West in the Middle East, not only providing ready access to its plentiful oil reserves, but also in tempering Arab aggression against Israel. Due to the evident hypocrisy of the regime, it has been necessary to suppress the ensuing dissent with brutality. Another important aspect has been preventing scholars from speaking of “politics”, that is, to criticize the regime.

King Faisal of Saudi Arabia took the throne in 1964

In The Two Faces of Islam, Stephen Schwartz writes, “Their tastes led them to taverns, casinos, brothels … They bought fleets of automobiles, private jets, and yachts the size of warships. They invested in valuable Western art they did not understand or like and which often offended the sensitivities of Wahhabi clerics. They spent as they wished, becoming patrons of international sexual enslavement and the exploitation of children.”

The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be espousing Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have evolved a version of Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the religion, at the expense of helping to understand broader political realities. Their manner has encouraged a literal interpretation of Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to exploit the Koran to justify the killing of innocents.

King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud

Ultimately, the profusion of Rothschild financed petro-dollars in the coffers of the Saudi family has made it possible for them to propagandize their bastardized version of Islam to other parts of the world, most notably to America, where they purportedly subsidize up to 80 percent of the mosques in the country, a version of Islam that substitutes political awareness for dogmatic insistence on ritualistic fanaticism.

Hillary beaming like a Cheshire cat in the presence of the Saudi King and his display of wealth

Source …

The chronology of the House of Saud

The Saudis have still got America over an (oil) barrel …

Brokeback Bush — a love affair with Saudi Oil …

See David Livingstone’s Reply to Criticism relating to the article reproduced in this post

David Livingstone is the author of The Dying God: The Hidden History of Western Civilization and Terrorism and the Illuminati: A Three Thousand Year History

16 responses

  1. Pingback: Prime minister meets with Saudi king Abdullah

  2. sal

    Nice article , i am a muslim but belong to no sect. this religion has been given a bad name due to these criminals. we are ruled by the feds i wish these forces would direct their energy to goodness to the world instead of these sick twisted games. Saudis are fooled by these puppets.

    August 22, 2012 at 1:47 pm

  3. The Muslim religion has been given a bad name by the child bride molester Muhammed and all Muslims are under a curse for worshiping the moon idol Allah and rejecting Jesus Christ as the Son of the heavenly Father.

    August 22, 2012 at 8:16 pm

  4. Sal

    Simon not according to the hundreds of millions of believers worldwide , islam broughtthe golden age as to opposed to the dark ages brought by chritianity , your rasism and hatred are the reasons the world is a sick and dark place you evil fool

    August 23, 2012 at 12:05 am

  5. ibrahim Abubakar

    Why r u always trying to cause chaos among Muslim Ummah!? Pls stop propagating this idiot false idea,or else Allah will punish u!

    September 12, 2012 at 7:16 am

  6. Well, Christianity is a Jewish religion for the Goyim. Jesus was a Jew too, so…

    March 20, 2013 at 3:33 pm

  7. Sorry, I’m confused, you just exposed the Sauds for being a heretical sect of Islam but then condemn all of Islam. I still like your site.

    March 20, 2013 at 3:36 pm

  8. First of all, I do not adhere to any organized religion or religious book. When I studied Judeo-Christianity I realized it is a tool for controlling people and brainwashing people to view Jews as untouchable people. If Christianity just contained the New Testament it would be a great universalist religion. Really though, the problem is Jews and their Jewish Supremacist religion creating all this religious strife between Christians and Muslims through this fake “War on Terror” nonsense that really kicked into high gear after 9/11. If Muslims could live away from Christians in their own lands, who cares what they believe, right? Jews in North America and Europe who control those governments are destroying those countries with multiculturalism.

    In hindsight all religious books are meant for controlling people, including Islam. We can’t know if Mohammad really received a revelation from God or he was just making it up. Then you may ask why is there not one universal religion with a code of conduct that would allow each and every ethnic group to live in harmony without wars etc.? I am not advocating multiculturalism here, just balance and harmony. I don’t think we need religion to be good people. If I was virtuous and didn’t follow any religious doctrine and there was a God, would I not go to heaven or whatnot? Is religion not about being a good person?

    Sorry for triple posting and I look forward to one of your replies.

    March 20, 2013 at 11:01 pm

  9. Religion per se has its place with God, and Christians shouldn’t forsake the assembling of themselves together for the worship and service of God, and they should be sure that it’s being done according to the pattern revealed by the apostles in the New Testament epistles and not in a carnal, sectarian way.

    James says “pure religion and undefiled before God is this. To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.” The moral basis of pure religion is to “love God with all thy heart, and all thy soul, and all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself”; and simple obedience to the revealed will of God in his word is higher than mere outward and carnal forms of religion—“to obey is better than sacrifice and to hearken than the fat of rams”.

    The Bible says you aren’t virtuous according to the first and now fallen creation of God, as the moral and biological offspring of the first man Adam; and that you’ve sinned and come short of the glory of God, and need to repent and believe the gospel, and receive Jesus as the head of the new creation of God, or you’ll be damned in hell fire for eternity with everyone else who has died unforgiven and with a defiled conscience.

    You need to address the issue of who Jesus Christ really was in the flesh as an historical figure. If he really was sent from the Father, and did miracles and spoke with such gracious words; and if he really is still so famous today for that reason, as he was when he first appeared on earth in the form of man, then you need to bow to him and believe him and reconcile with God through the blood of his cross.

    Religion for many people is doubtless about “being a good person”, but a lot of “good people” or people held in high esteem in a carnal way according to human reasoning and human standards have died without repentance and true faith in God. Salvation is by the grace of God through faith in the blood atonement of his Son Jesus Christ; and not of works on our part, lest any man should boast.

    March 26, 2013 at 4:38 am

  10. Abu Youssed AlDjazairi

    Without Islam and What Islam has given to Europe, the west could be still living in the dark age and the rennaisance could have never happened. Thank you Islam and to the tolerance of the musilims.

    April 29, 2013 at 7:51 am

  11. The so called Golden Age under the Moorish Muslims was the real Dark Age in Western Europe, because Muslims were spreading the old pagan Persian moon idol worship that had been revived by the child bride molester Muhammed who’d persuaded the gullible Arabs to toss the moon idols out of a sanctuary at Mecca and use it as a new center of the Arabs’ ideal antichristian world.

    Muhammed and his followers ‘reinforced the sanctity’ of the moon idol shrine at Mecca for their Unitarian idol, nicknamed Allah, by finding a piece of a meteorite, in the form of black rock that fell from heaven, and enclosing it in a silver sheath in the form of a woman’s vagina in the shrine of the Kaaba at Mecca.

    Mohammed’s followers then told the gullible Arabs that they should make a pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in their life-time; and walk around the Kaaba in a circular manner, in the same way that the moon circles the Earth. They were also told that they should then kiss the black stone of the Kaaba enclosed in a silver sheath like a vagina, because it ostensibly fell from the moon and because by doing so they were ostensibly having some sort of oral sex with the Muslims’ feminine moon idol Allah.

    Mohammed’s revival of the old pagan Persian moon idol worship increased in popularity among the Arabs, because the Jews had told his followers to also concoct the doctrine that God had really made his covenant with the Arabs’ patriarch Ishmael, the son of Abraham, by his Egyptian concubine Hagar, and not with the Jews’ patriarch Issac, the father of Israel’s patriarch Jacob.

    This lie was reinforced by telling the Arabs that the black stone in the Kaaba that they kissed had fallen by the decree of God from the moon and was “the stone of Ishmael” who was rejected by Abraham’s wife Sarah, when she rejected Abraham’s concubine Hagar and sent her away with her son to die in the wilderness. Something further reinforced by telling the Arabs that the black stone of the Kaaba (aka the stone of Ishmael) was really the biblical “stone that the builders rejected”, that had “become the chief cornerstone of the new creation of God”; and which God’s Son Jesus Christ had of course quite rightly said he had exemplified, when he came to establish a new covenant with fallen humanity, by dying in their stead after being rejected as the rock of salvation and crucified by the Jews.

    The result of the lie of Islam has of course been a permanent and militant rift between the pagan followers of that religion and the righteous followers of God’s Son Jesus Christ, which has of course suited the Jews’ agenda of dividing their enemies against each other to facilitate their ongoing destruction at a later date. The invention of Islam’s doctrine of a covenant that God ostensibly made with Ishmael has of course also made Arabs act in a haughty manner towards Jews; and issued in the invention of all sorts hypocritical and unjust laws of self-righteousness in the Quran and sharia law, just like the ones the followers of the false Unitarian Pharisaical religion of Judaism have put together in the Talmud.

    The depraved laws of the Quran, sharia law, and the Talmud ostensibly add to the sanctity before God Muslims and Jews alone ostensibly have, as a result of the covenants that their nations alone ostensibly have with God. When the only really valid covenant with God is of course the blood of the covenant of the cross of his righteous Son Jesus Christ that justifies all who believe in him from all things.

    If Jews and Muslims would humble themselves and accept the blood atonement of Jesus Christ for humanity, there would of course be no need for the depravity of the Quran and Talmudic and sharia law.

    Religion of Peace? The Dagestan beheading massacre. Muslim Filth in action …

    April 29, 2013 at 8:37 pm

  12. goodluck

    I am sure if all this allegation is true or not surely we that Allah abhors hypocrisy.

    October 7, 2013 at 7:36 am

  13. Anver

    Simon Gibson you Moron,
    The coming of the prophet Mohammed was mentioned in the old scriptures. You modified these scriptures to suit yourselves .
    Jews hate Jesus Christ.
    Wait for the Mahdi , then you’ll witness true events, u asshole

    August 3, 2014 at 1:06 pm

  14. mike

    Simon I have that book that u plagiarized and tried to pawn off as your own thoughts. If ur gonna criticize something use your own words and thoughts not someone else’s u try to pawn off as your own. It makes u look silly

    November 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm

  15. Anonymous

    Simon Gibson if your so knowledgeable you must’ve read THE HOLY QURAN
    Your CREATOR has a challenge for you.

    Allah’s Challenge in the Quran to produce work similar to it

    The Quran is not only unique in the way in which it presents its subject matter, but it is also unique in that it is a miracle itself. By the term “miracle,” we mean the performance of a supernatural or extraordinary event which cannot be duplicated by humans. It has been documented that Prophet Muhammad (S), challenged the Arabs to produce a literary work of a similar caliber as the Quran, but they were unable to do so in spite of their well-known eloquence and literary powers. The challenge to reproduce the Quran was presented to the Arabs and mankind in three stages:

    1. The Whole Quran

    In the Quran, Allah commanded the Prophet (S) to challenge all of creation to create a book of the stature of the Quran:

    islam on Allah’s Challenge in the Quran to produce work similar to it

    “Say: ‘If all mankind and the jinn would come together to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce its like even though they exerted all and their strength in aiding one another.’” (Quran 17:88)

    2. Ten Chapters

    Next, Allah made the challenge ostensibly easier by asking those who denied its divine origin to imitate even ten chapters of the Quran:

    islam on Allah’s Challenge in the Quran to produce work similar to it

    “Or do they say that he has invented it? Say (to them), ‘Bring ten invented chapters like it, and call (for help) on whomever you can besides God, if you are truthful.” (Quran 11:13)

    3. One Chapter

    This final challenge was to produce even a single chapter to match what is in the Quran, whose shortest chapter, al-Kawthar, consists of only three verses:

    islam on Allah’s Challenge in the Quran to produce work similar to it

    “And if you all are in doubt about what I have revealed to My servant, bring a single chapter like it, and call your witnesses besides God if you are truthful.” (Quran 2:23)

    These challenges were not just empty words with no one caring to prove them wrong. Prophet Muhammad’s call to monotheism, to the abolition of idolatry in all its forms, and to the equality of slaves and their masters, threatened the whole socio-economic framework of Mecca society in general, and the position of the ruling Quraishee tribe from which the Prophet (S) came in particular. Mecca, the trading center of Arabia, as well as its spiritual center, desperately wanted to stop the spread of Islam. Yet all that the Prophet’s opponents had to do to crush the movement was to make up a single chapter like any one of those which the Prophet (S) and his followers were reciting to the people. A number of Quraishee orators and poets tried to imitate the Quran, but they failed. They then resorted to offering him vast amounts of wealth, the position of king over them, and the most noble and beautiful of their women in exchange for his promise to stop inviting people to Islam. He responded to them by reciting the first thirteen verses of Chapter Fussilat, until they asked him to stop. [1] The Quraish also resorted to torturing their slaves and relatives who had embraced Islam in a vain attempt to cause them to revert to paganism. Later, they organized an economic boycott against the Prophet (S) his followers and the members of his clan, Banu Hashim, in an attempt to starve them into submission. But even this plan eventually failed. Finally, they plotted to kill him in his home by sending armed young men from each of the clans of Quraish in order that the guilt of his murder be shared by all the clans, making revenge by the Prophet’s clan impossible.

    However, Allah enabled the Prophet (S) and his followers to flee Mecca and join a new band of converts who had arisen among the tribes of a city to the north called Yathrib. Islam spread rapidly through the clans of Yathrib, and within a year Muslims became the city’s majority. Prophet Muhammad (S) was then made the ruler, and the name of the city was changed to Medina tunn-Nabi (The City of the Prophet may God bless him), which was then shortened to “Medina” and sometimes referred to as Al-Madinah Al-Munawwara.

    It has been suggested that the inimitability of the Quran is not necessarily unique, for great English poets like Shakespeare, Chaucer, or great poets in any language tend to have distinctly unique styles which set them apart from their contemporaries. However, if, for example, some leading poet of today were to make an in-depth study of Shakespeare’s writings and write a sonnet in Shakespeare’s style in old ink and on old paper, then claim that he had discovered a lost poem of Shakespeare’s, the literary world would probably accept this claim, even after careful study. Thus, even the greatest of poets could be imitated; no matter how unique his style was, just as the famous painters have been imitated. [In fact, some English scholars consider much of what has been attributed to Shakespeare to have been written by his contemporary, Christopher Marlowe.] The Quran, however, is way above this level, as (unsuccessful) attempts to forge chapters have been made throughout the ages (by many Arab literary scholars). And, as was mentioned before, the incentive to imitate the Quran was more intense during the time of its revelation when literally skills were at their peak than at any other time, yet there was no successful attempt.

    January 23, 2015 at 11:13 pm

  16. I don’t recognize the authority of the pagan UNITARIAN moon idol that the Muslims nickname “Allah” as the Creator, so its challenge as a god has no relevance for me, as outlined in your comment. In fact I consider it sacrilege to use the name Allah or “the God” for anyone other than the only true and TRINITARIAN God of Israel’s patriarchs and the Bible …

    January 24, 2015 at 12:32 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s