Blatant leftist JEW under-reporting on TRUMP and under-representation of TRUMP support decried on a jittery judaized MSM

The evil JEW media fears a complete collapse of their leftist propaganda network, when TRUMP proves their lies and under-representation of him to be their own undoing on November 8

Curt Schilling: [Leftist JEW contrived] polls are totally under-representing Trump support

Curt Schilling: Why do Jews support Democrats?…

In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, the former Red Sox pitcher incited further controversy by making some comments about the Democratic party and Israel. Schilling said, “I don’t understand, and maybe this is the amateur, non-politician in me, I don’t understand how people of Jewish faith can back the Democratic Party, which over the last 50 years has been so clearly anti-Israel, so clearly anti-Jewish Israel.”

THE JEW Tapper answered humorously, “well, I don’t speak for Jews. And I don’t support the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. I would imagine, to try to answer your question, that one of the reasons many Jews are Democrats has more to do with Democrats’ support for social welfare programs and that sort of thing.”


Yes indeed, more Americans are starting to get it, that the reprobate JEWS want to use “liberalism” and socialism to undo the White Christian European values that made America great and that testify against the JEWS’ evil monetary based takeover, that’ll reduce all Gentiles to the Jews’ debt slaves in an ideal antichristian world under Israels’ biblical end-time Davidic antichrist…

Also check out this infostormer article...

Lee just wrote an article like two hours ago explaining how the Presidential polling systems are rigged to the point where they are utterly useless for research and reporting purposes.

And now we have a Podesta email chain detailing the exact methods for oversampling, lying, and skewing surveys to benefit Democratic candidates for political office.


From Zero Hedge:

Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats.

Now, for all of you out there who still aren’t convinced that the polls are rigged, we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in startling detail, exactly how to rig them.

The email starts out with a request for recommendations on “oversamples for polling” in order to “maximize what we get out of our media polling.”

“I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.”

The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:

Research, micro-targeting & polling projects
– Over-sample Hispanics
– Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
– Over-sample the Native American population

For Florida, the report recommends “consistently monitoring” samples to makes sure they’re “not too old” and “has enough African American and Hispanic voters.” Meanwhile, “independent” voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.

– Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
– On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.


Meanwhile, it’s suggested that national polls over sample “key districts / regions” and “ethnic” groups “as needed.”

And just in case some of you are having a bit of difficulty in following the specifics, here is a brief example about how this is done.

Pollsters working for a Jew media outlet, say ABC, decide to mess up a late Presidential poll by going into a Black area to survey the wildlife at a level that skews the percentages towards the Democratic candidate.

Numbers are tallied after talking to congregants at various Negro churches, and a final summary places Leftist voters between 5-15 points ahead of the largely White supporters of the Republican candidate, thus making sure the actual numbers of the poll follow predetermined goals.

And while polls are required to publish these raw numbers somewhere in their work, sometimes behind a paywall, but usually embedded behind several windows and links for free, few normies actually read this stuff, but usually stop after the simplified statistics are observed.

Demoralization and apathy then sets in, and one begins to witness a self-fulfilling prophecy take place that leads to fake numbers transforming into real ones.

And for the hell of it, take a look at the actual manual (I’m shocked these people are this arrogant and stupid) that was sent as an attachment to the Podesta email…

Angry yet, White Man?

And do you notice who Podesta was talking to about such blatant fraud and corruption?

I’ll give you a hint: a list of these people would read like a synagogue sign-in sheet.

%d bloggers like this: