“For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power.”
You might be inclined to think that the Jews wouldn’t want to see the spread of Islam in the West; because Muslims have been militantly opposed to the Jews, in whatever country they may be. But be aware that the Jews will use anything on hand at any time to undo their Christian and Gentile enemies; especially multiculturalism, which is why the hypocritical Jews won’t have a bar of it in the apartheid state of Israel.
Even the synagogue of Satan ruling in Jewry has had melting pot multiculturalism on its agenda for the gullible goyim, as a precursor to ideal Jewish world government, aka the ideal universal reign of Israel’s end-time antichrist.
Hence we read in the Jews’ Protocols …
“Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations.
“In order to succeed in this we must use great cunning and penetration during negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is called the “official language,” we shall keep to the opposite tactics and assume the mask of honesty and complacency. In this way the peoples and governments of the GOYIM, whom we have taught to look only at the outside whatever we present to their notice, will still continue to accept us as the benefactors and saviours of the human race.”—Protocol # 7
Jews will, of course, use multiculturalism to undo any Gentile state or nation; but the Jews’ invention of multiculturalism has never been used as a weapon against the vanquished goyim in any of the Jew established communist states and nations. Simply because a sovietized goy state or nation is, of course, what the Jews want the Gentile world, centered on the apartheid state of Israel, to be at the end of the day.
Check out this article …
Wall Street Journal columnist Dorothy Rabinowitz is worried about Major Nidel Malik Hasan who opened fire in Fort Hood killing 12 fellow soldiers and wounding 32 others. Rabinowitz attributes this attack to a combination of “Hasan’s well-documented jihadist sympathies” and multiculturalism.
Associating multiculturalism with Islam is a daring rhetorical move, especially when that rhetorical move is made by a Jew, because Dorothy Rabinowitz must know, even if the dumb goyim who read her columns in the Wall Street Journal do not, that multiculturalism has been a completely Jewish creation from start to finish. For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power.
In his essay, “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review,” University of California at Long Beach Professor Kevin MacDonald shows in exhaustive detail how Jewish organizations supported multiculturalism almost from the moment when eastern European Jews arrived in significant numbers on these shores.
According to MacDonald, the “historical record supports the proposition that making the US into a multicultural society has been a major goal of organized Jewry beginning in the 19th century.”
The main way in which Jews promoted multiculturalism is by changing this nation’s immigration laws.
“Jews,” according to MacDonald, “have been ‘the single most persistent pressure group favoring a liberal immigration policy’ in the US in the entire immigration debate beginning in 1881.”
MacDonald goes on to cite one Jewish authority after another to back up his case. According to [Sheldon M] Neuringer: “Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defense and community relations organization. Over the years their spokesmen had assiduously attended congressional hearings and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such nonsectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons.”
According to Nathan C. Belth: “In Congress, through all the years when the immigration battles were being fought, the names of Jewish legislators were in the forefront of the liberal forces: from Adolph Sabath to Samuel Dickstein and Emanuel Celler in the House and from Herbert H. Lehman to Jacob Javits in the Senate. Each in this time was leader of the ADL and of major organizations concerned with democratic development.”
The Jewish promotion of multiculturalism in America had two main goals:
1) “maximizing the number of Jewish immigrants” and
2) “opening up the US to immigration from all of the peoples of the world.” Both goals paradoxically used “diversity” as a stalking horse to advance Jewish ethnocentrism. The whole point of multiculturalism is not so much the promotion of diversity as it is the demographic dilution of homogeneity.
Representative Leavitt saw through the diversity ploy when he complained that the Jews were “the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their race throughout centuries because they believe sincerely that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals.”
The purpose of multiculturalism has always been to subvert coherent cultures, weaken the majority, and thereby enhance the Jews’ power.
Or, as MacDonald puts it,
“Ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interest because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. This results in the diffusion of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism. Historically, major anti-Semitic movements have tended to erupt in societies that have been, apart from the Jews, religiously and/or ethnically homogeneous.”
The early opponents of multiculturalism also feared Jews as agents of cultural subversion: “Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories; they compose and dish out to us our jazz music, they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers.”
Jewish immigrants were also “widely perceived to be … disproportionately involved in radical political movements,” a fact often acknowledged by the Jewish press. In one of its editorials, The American Hebrew pointed out that “we must not forget the immigrants form Russia and Austria will becoming from countries infested with Bolshevism, and it will require more than a superficial effort to make good citizens out of them.”
The fact that Jewish immigrants form Eastern Europe were viewed as “infected with Bolshevism. . . unpatriotic, alien, unassimilable” resulted in a wave of anti-Semitism in the 1920s and contributed to the restrictive immigration legislation of the period. Almost a decade after the immigration debate ended with the triumph of the restrictionists in 1924, Jewish immigration was still having consequences for American identity. As MacDonald points out, “In Philadelphia in the 1930s, fully 72.2 percent of the Communist Party members were the children of Jewish immigrants who came to the US in the late 19th and early 20th century.”
Also check out this article …
Sweden, once regarded as one of Europe’s most liberal and radical societies, has now become a dangerous place for the Muslims. Islam is regarded as the most unwelcome religion for a number of Swedish people. The far-right Sweden Democrats party has its roots in the neo-Nazi movement. It has warned “ the dangers of Islamization” and has a controversial campaign against the Muslims in Sweden. Sweden is no more a bastion of religious freedom and tolerance. The shooting and killing of a Muslim at the largest mosque in Sweden has raised a new debate on the activities of certain militant Christian groups. The objective of certain Christian militants seems to “shoot at Muslim immigrants.”
Islam, in fact, has challenged the hollow civilization of the West. All the great philosophers, thinkers and leaders feel that that Islam will overpower the West in near future. The West acknowledges that its survival is impossible. This civilization, like other civilization, in the past is about to die. Ironically a number of Christians believe that Islam is at war with them. The West has already lost its religious lustre and framework.
It is a hollow and confused civilization. Christian fanatics and fundamentalists believe that it is not Islam versus the West; it is Western civilization or Islam in the West. It is an anxious moment for the West. Islam is marching too fast towards their big cities. They feel fear and anxiety. It has raised feeling of animosity between the West and Islam. The truth is that western civilization faces its greatest test at the hands of Islam today. The West does not try to understand the Muslim viewpoint. It wants to thrust its hollow civilization and stupid thinking on Islam. This is the major cause of failure of understanding between the two sides. T. S. Eliot, a Nobel Prize winner in literature, mourns the loss of West: ‘We are the hollow men’ & ‘This is the dead land.’
With the blessings of EL . I ….