The Jews and their acolytes have distracted researchers from the plain evidence that points to a Jew from Poland, Aaron Kosminski (1865-1919), as the perpetrator of the notorious ripper crimes in and around London’s Whitechapel district in 1888.
Whitechapel was a refuge for Jews fleeing poverty and ‘persecution’ in Eastern Europe; and it provided the backdrop for the popular novel: Children of the Ghetto, by the Jew Israel Zangwill, and others by the Jew Simon Blumenfeld who had settled in London’s East End. The classic Yiddish novel Adventures of Mottel the Cantor’s Son, by the Jew Sholem Aleichem, was partly based on Eastern European Jews’ lives in early 20th century Whitechapel. Notable Jews born in Whitechapel have included Abraham Beame, first Jewish mayor of New York, Jewish businessman Jack Cohen, founder of the Tesco supermarket chain, Jewish author Emanuel Litvinoff, and Jewish gangster Jack “Spot” Comer.
Aaron Kosminski was another Jew that lived in Whitechapel, and there’s little doubt that he used his familiarity with anatomy and the surgical skills of the Eastern European Jewish ritual slaughterers (shochetim) to make ritual cuts on those he slew, when operating according to the pseudonym of Jack the Ripper. The cuts Kosminski made were also imitating those made by Jewish ritual slaughterers of Christians and Gentiles, and in crass imitation of the ritual cuts of the Aaronic priests in Israel, who prepared animals as sacrifices to Jehovah under the old and now defunct Mosaic legal dispensation.
In fact the Jew Aaron Kosminski may have even believed he was of the Aaronic priesthood in some sort of twisted way; not simply because he was the namesake of the high priest Aaron, the brother of Moses, but quite possibly also to justify himself in some sort of psychotic way for perpetrating his horrific serial crimes against women in and around Whitechapel.
For there were Old Testament priestly rites that separated the internal organs of the animals offered to Jehovah, in a manner similar to the way Kosminski removed, cut up, and even on occasion ate the internals of the women he slew. In fact Kosminsky may have even believed he was putting the prostitutes he slew on trial for adultery in some sort of crass priestly way. For there were priestly rites in Israel under the Mosaic legal dispensation that involved bringing a woman suspected of adultery before a priest and ‘trying her internally’, by causing her to drink “the bitter water that causes the curse”, which would make her belly swell and thigh rot, if she was guilty and thus condemned before God (Nu. 5.11-31).
Kosminski even had a peculiar penchant for first slitting the victim’s throat with a scalpel or very sharp knife, and in a manner similar to the way Jewish butchers first slash the throat of a kosher kill with a knife with a razor edge to drain its blood.
Dr Robert Anderson, head of the C.I.D., and Chief Inspector Donald Swanson, the police officer in charge of the ripper case, both stated that they had little doubt that Kosminski of all of the suspects was the culprit. After the notorious Whitechapel “double event” early in the morning of 30 September 1888, a woman’s blood stained apron was found on the stairwell of a predominantly Jewish tenement on Goulston Street; and on the wall of the tenement, above where the apron was found, it was written: “the Juwes [Kosminsky's typical bad spelling] are the men that will not be blamed for nothing”.
The Jew Kosminski was a somewhat conceited creature, and he liked to taunt those trying to find him, and he did so by dubbing himself “Jack the Ripper” in at least one letter he wrote and delivered to the police. Kosminski even had the cheek to partially severe his next victim’s ear, after promising in a letter delivered to the police to “clip the ladys ears off”.
But what’s of interest here is whether Kosminski chose the nickname ”Jack” because he was a Jew, and hence ostensiby a descendant of the patriarch Jacob whose name is cognate with “Jack” and has cabbalistic affinity with it according to its first three letters. For there is reason to believe Kosminski either wanted to blame the Jews out of spite or because he was conceited, and wanted attention and fame in history books, as the most wicked Jewish ritual murderer of all time.
Here’s a post mortem from the distinguished police surgeon Dr. Thomas Bond describing “Jack’s” ghastly Marie Kelly murder:
“The body was lying naked in the middle of the bed, the shoulders flat but the axis of the body inclined to the left side of the bed. The head was turned on the left cheek. The left arm was close to the body with the forearm flexed at a right angle and lying across the abdomen.
The right arm was slightly abducted from the body and rested on the mattress. The elbow was bent, the forearm supine with the fingers clenched. The legs were wide apart, the left thigh at right angles to the trunk and the right forming an obtuse angle with the pubes.
The whole of the surface of the abdomen and thighs was removed and the abdominal cavity emptied of its viscera. The breasts were cut off, the arms mutilated by several jagged wounds and the face hacked beyond recognition of the features. The tissues of the neck were severed all round down to the bone.
The viscera were found in various parts viz: the uterus and kidneys with one breast under the head, the other breast by the right foot, the liver between the feet, the intestines by the right side and the spleen by the left side of the body. The flaps removed from the abdomen and thighs were on a table.
The bed clothing at the right corner was saturated with blood, and on the floor beneath was a pool of blood covering about two feet square. The wall by the right side of the bed and in a line with the neck was marked by blood which had struck it in a number of separate splashes.
The face was gashed in all directions, the nose, cheeks, eyebrows, and ears being partly removed. The lips were blanched and cut by several incisions running obliquely down to the chin. There were also numerous cuts extending irregularly across all the features.
The neck was cut through the skin and other tissues right down to the vertebrae, the fifth and sixth being deeply notched. The skin cuts in the front of the neck showed distinct ecchymosis. The air passage was cut at the lower part of the larynx through the cricoid cartilage.
Both breasts were more or less removed by circular incisions, the muscle down to the ribs being attached to the breasts. The intercostals between the fourth, fifth, and sixth ribs were cut through and the contents of the thorax visible through the openings.
The skin and tissues of the abdomen from the costal arch to the pubes were removed in three large flaps. The right thigh was denuded in front to the bone, the flap of skin, including the external organs of generation, and part of the right buttock. The left thigh was stripped of skin fascia, and muscles as far as the knee.
The left calf showed a long gash through skin and tissues to the deep muscles and reaching from the knee to five inches above the ankle. Both arms and forearms had extensive jagged wounds.
The right thumb showed a small superficial incision about one inch long, with extravasation of blood in the skin, and there were several abrasions on the back of the hand moreover showing the same condition.
On opening the thorax it was found that the right lung was minimally adherent by old firm adhesions. The lower part of the lung was broken and torn away. The left lung was intact. It was adherent at the apex and there were a few adhesions over the side. In the substances of the lung there were several nodules of consolidation.
The pericardium was open below and the heart absent. In the abdominal cavity there was some partly digested food of fish and potatoes, and similar food was found in the remains of the stomach attached to the intestines.”
Dr. George Bagster Phillips was also present at the scene, and gave the following testimony at the inquest:
“The mutilated remains of a female were lying two-thirds over towards the edge of the bedstead nearest the door. She had only her chemise on, or some underlinen garment. I am sure that the body had been removed subsequent to the injury which caused her death from that side of the bedstead that was nearest the wooden partition, because of the large quantity of blood under the bedstead and the saturated condition of the sheet and the palliasse at the corner nearest the partition.
The blood was produced by the severance of the carotid artery, which was the cause of death. The injury was inflicted while the deceased was lying at the right side of the bedstead.”
Police dossiers said “Jack” was a compulsive masturbator, had a great hatred for women, strong homicidal tendencies, and lived close to where the atrocities took place, which means Kosminski could indeed be the man. Especially since commentators have suggested that he may have become depraved sexually as a result of sleeping in the same bed as his sisters in the Pale of Settlement under the Tsarist regime, and after seeing family members raped in pogroms.
If “Jack” was indeed a Jew, it would be further endorsed by the fact that the Jew Joseph Lawende (1859-1925), accompanied by a Jewish ritual slaughterer by the name of Joseph Levy, and the Jew Henry Harris, had witnessed a prelude to the Catherine Eddowes murder. Especially since a Doctor Brown had testified at the Eddowes inquest that a Jewish star or Magen David had been “reflected” from the dead woman’s cheeks in the form of two triangular flaps of skin.
The Jew Israel Schwartz witnessed another of Kosminski’s atrocities, but refused to testify against his co-religionist; probably because the Jews’ sacred literature, the Talmud, says any Jew who informs on another Jew, or denounces a Jew to a non-Jewish authority, must be killed or severely punished, and because the London Jewish community had told him to remain silent.
Marie Kelly’s murder was ostensibly Kosminsky’s last Whitechapel atrocity, but probably wasn’t perpetrated by him at all. For it was more likely the work of the three Jews Lawende, Levy (the butcher), and Harris, and designed to draw attention away from the obvious Jewishness of Kosminski’s crimes.
For the Jews would have known that Marie Kelly was a controversial figure in London at the time, because she once cared for the illegitimate daughter of the grandson of Queen Victoria, and hence had knowledge of the darker side of Prince Eddy, which if scandalized further by being associated with Jack the Ripper’s murders might have made people think Kelly was done in because she posed a threat to the monarchy, which could well have been the decisive factor in the overthrow of the monarchy in England.
For the British populace was being duped into supporting the Jews’ ruse to introduce a socialist republic to replace the unpopular reign of the German House of Hanover and to circumvent the prospect of the reign of a monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha; a ruse that culminated in police opposition to socialists on Bloody Sunday, 13 February 1887.
The Freemason William Hogarth’s engraving: “The Reward of Cruelty” shows three ritual murderers operating in a manner strikingly similar to the way Whitechapel victim Marie Kelly was despatched; and if the Kelly was, indeed, done in by the three Jews Lawende, Levy (the butcher), and Harris, and not by Kosminski, she may have been killed by Freemasons in imitation of a Masonic rite, and to make her death look like the work of a Masonic agent of Prince Eddy.
In 1891 Aaron Kosminski was consigned to an asylum, where Jewish sayanim (i.e., “helpers”) declined to kill him but heavily drugged him; and no doubt so that he wouldn’t be able to testify against his co-religionists who had knowledge of his awful crimes, but had remained silent in line with their ancient tradition of complicity in criminality after that fashion.